Role of spontaneous reporting in investigating the relationship between mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and myocarditis: the French perspective

Aim of the study: Post-mRNA coronavirus diseases 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines myocarditis emerged as a rare adverse effect, particularly in adolescents and young adults, and was labeled as such for both vaccines in the summer of 2021. This study aims to summarize the timeline and process of signal detection, substantiation, and quantification of myocarditis cases related to mRNA vaccines in France. Methods: The intensive monitoring plan for COVID-19 vaccine safety was based on case-by-case analysis of all cases collected in the French spontaneous reporting database (base nationale de pharmacovigilance, BNPV). Cases were evaluated by drug safety medical professionals and discussed at a national level for signal detection purposes. Reported cases were compared to the number of vaccine-exposed persons up to September 30, 2021. Reporting rates (Rr) of myocarditis per 100,000 injections were calculated and stratified according to age, gender, and injection rank of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 vaccines. Poisson distribution was used to compute Rrs 95% Confidence Interval (95% CI). Results.- The case-by-case analysis detected a possible cluster of myocarditis in April 2021 (5 cases, 4 after the 2nd injection). In June 2021, the signal was substantiated with 12 cases (9 related to BNT162b2, and 3 to mRNA-1273). As of September 2021, almost 73 million BNT162b2 and 10 million mRNA-1273 doses had been injected. The Rr per 100,000 injections was 0.5 (0.5-0.6) for BNT162b2 and 1.1 (95% CI 0.9-1.3) for mRNA-1273. The difference among vaccines was more pronounced after the second injection, particularly in men aged 18-24 years (4.3 [3.4-5.5] for BNT162b2 vs. 13.9 [9.2-20.1] for mRNA-1273) and aged 25-29 years (1.9 [1.2-2.9] vs. 7.0 [3.4-12.9]). Conclusion: The study highlighted the role of the spontaneous reporting system in the detection, assessment, and quantification of myocarditis related to m-RNA vaccines. It suggested from September 2021 that mRNA-1273 was reasonably related to a higher risk of myocarditis than BNT162b2 in people under 30, particularly after the second injection.

Pharmacovigilance des médicaments et des vaccins contre la COVID-19 durant la pandémie: comment le Réseau français des centres régionaux de pharmacovigilance a relevé le défi?

Résumé La pandémie secondaire au virus SARS-CoV2 s'est traduite, pour la pharmacovigilance institutionnelle française, par une « crise sanitaire » en 2 temps : la phase coronavirus disease 2019 - « COVID-19 » pendant laquelle les missions des centres régionaux de pharmacovigilance (CRPV) étaient de détecter un impact des médicaments sur cette maladie, qu'il s'agisse du rôle éventuellement aggravant de certains médicaments ou d'une modification du profil de sécurité de médicaments utilisés pour la prise en charge de la COVID-19. La seconde phase a fait suite à la mise à disposition des vaccins contre la COVID-19, pendant laquelle les missions des CRPV étaient de détecter le plus précocement possible, tout nouvel effet indésirable grave, source d'un potentiel signal qui modifierait le rapport bénéfices/risques d'un vaccin et nécessiterait la mise en place de mesures de sécurité sanitaire. Pendant ces 2 périodes, la détection de signal est restée le cœur de métier des CRPV. Les CRPV ont du s'organiser pour prendre en charge l'augmentation historique de la volumétrie de déclarations et de demandes d'avis. Les CRPV en charge du suivi des vaccins ont fait face à une activité démesurée sur une longue durée, afin de synthétiser l'ensemble des déclarations, d'identifier, en temps réel, l'émergence de signaux et de produire un rapport hebdomadaire. L'organisation nationale mise en place avec l'Agence nationale de sécurité du médicament et des produits de santé a permis de relever le challenge que représentait un tel suivi instantané des vaccins. Le Réseau français des CRPV a su s'adapter en faisant preuve d'agilité et de flexibilité et en démontrant son efficacité dans la détection précoce de signaux. Cette crise a également confirmé la supériorité de la détection manuelle/humaine des signaux en terme de puissance et d'efficience pour détecter rapidement un nouvel effet indésirable médicamenteux et prendre rapidement des mesures de réduction du risque. Pour maintenir la performance des CRPV français dans la détection de tels signaux et surveiller tous les médicaments comme ils doivent l'être un nouveau modèle de financement permettant de corriger l'inadéquation des moyens d'expertise des CRPV au regard de la volumétrie des déclarations est maintenant nécessaire.

Monitoring the safety of drugs and COVID-19 vaccines by the French Pharmacovigilance Centers during the pandemic: A win-win bet with Health Authorities!

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2) pandemic virus was a "health crisis" and a significant burden also for the French pharmacovigilance system. It took its toll in 2 phases, the first being in early 2020 when very little was known, and during which the missions of the 31 Regional Pharmacovigilance Centers (RPVCs) from university hospitals were to detect adverse reactions of drugs used in the context of the disease. Whether as a possible aggravating role on COVID-19, or displaying a different safety profile during its course, or to assess safety of curative treatment, this phase preceded that of the arrival of dedicated vaccines. Then the RPVCs' missions were to detect, as early as possible, any new serious adverse effect leading to a potential signal that would modify the benefit/risk ratio of a vaccine and require the implementation of health safety measures. During these two distinct periods, signal detection remained the core business of the RPVCs. Each RPVC had to organize itself to handle an unprecedented surge of declarations and requests for advice, from health care professionals and patients alike. "Leading" RPVCs, who were in charge of monitoring vaccines, had to deal with an extraordinary workload (still going on to this date), to generate in real-time and on a weekly basis, a summary of all the adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports as well as an extended analysis of the different safety signals. The organization put in place at the beginning of the health crisis, adapted to the context of the vaccines, allowed to meet the challenge of real-time pharmacovigilance monitoring, and to identify many safety signals. Efficient "short-circuits exchanges" with the French Regional Pharmacovigilance Centers Network (RPVCN) were paramount to the National Agency for the Safety of Medicines and Health Products (ANSM) to develop an optimal collaborative partnership. The French RPVCN has shown at this occasion both agility and flexibility, swiftly adapting to vaccine- and media-related unrest, and demonstrated its effectiveness in the early detection of safety signals. This crisis also confirmed the superiority of manual/human signal detection over automated ones, as the most effective and powerful tool to date to rapidly detect and validate a new ADR and enable to elaborate rapid risk reduction measures. To maintain the performance of French RPVCN in signal detection and to monitor all drugs as they should, and as expected by our fellow citizens, a new funding model should be considered.

[Monitoring the safety of drugs and COVID-19 vaccines by the French Pharmacovigilance Centers during the pandemic: a win-win bet with Health Authorities!] / Pharmacovigilance des médicaments et des vaccins contre la COVID-19 durant la pandémie : comment le Réseau français des centres régionaux de pharmacovigilance a relevé le défi ?

The pandemic subsequent to the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus resulted, for the French institutional pharmacovigilance, in a "health crisis" in 2 phases: the coronavirus disease 2019 - "COVID-19" phase during which the missions of the Regional Pharmacovigilance Centres (RPVC) were to detect a possible impact of drugs on this disease, as whether existed a possible aggravating role of certain drugs, or the safety profile of drugs used for the management of COVID-19 could evolve. The second phase followed the availability of COVID-19 vaccines, during which the RPVCs' missions were to detect as early as possible any new serious adverse effect, source of a potential signal that would modify the benefit/risk ratio of a vaccine and require the implementation of health safety measures. During these two periods, signal detection remained the core business of the RPVCs. The RPVCs had to organize themselves to handle an historical surge of declarations and requests for advice, whereas the RPVCs in charge of monitoring vaccines had to deal with an extraordinary dense activity over a long period of time, in order to produce in real time and on a weekly basis, a summary of all the declarations and an analysis of safety signals. The national organization put in place made it possible to meet the challenge of real-time pharmacovigilance monitoring of 4 vaccines with conditional marketing authorizations. Short-circuit efficient exchanges with the French Regional Pharmacovigilance Centres Network was paramount for the French National Agency for medicines and health products (Agence nationale de sécurité du médicament et des produits de santé) to develop an optimal collaborative partnership. The RPVC network has shown agility and flexibility, has been able to adapt swiftly and demonstrated its effectiveness in the early detection of safety signals. This crisis confirmed the superiority of manual/human signal detection as the most effective and powerful tool to date, to rapidly detect a new adverse drug reaction and enable to elaborate rapid measures of risk reduction. In order to maintain the performance of French RPVCs in signal detection and to monitor all drugs as they should and as expected by our fellow citizens, a new funding model correcting the inadequacy of RPVCs' expertise resources in relation to the volume of reports should be considered.

Role of spontaneous reporting in investigating the relationship between mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and myocarditis: The French perspective.

AIM OF THE STUDY: Post-mRNA coronavirus diseases 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines myocarditis emerged as a rare adverse effect, particularly in adolescents and young adults, and was labeled as such for both vaccines in the summer of 2021. This study aims to summarize the timeline and process of signal detection, substantiation, and quantification of myocarditis cases related to mRNA vaccines in France. METHODS: The intensive monitoring plan for COVID-19 vaccine safety was based on case-by-case analysis of all cases collected in the French spontaneous reporting database (Base nationale de pharmacovigilance, BNPV). Cases were evaluated by drug safety medical professionals and discussed at a national level for signal detection purposes. Reported cases were compared to the number of vaccine-exposed persons up to September 30th, 2021. Reporting rates (Rr) of myocarditis per 100,000 injections were calculated and stratified according to age, gender, and injection rank of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 vaccines. Poisson distribution was used to compute Rrs 95% Confidence Interval (95% CI). RESULTS: The case-by-case analysis detected a possible cluster of myocarditis in April 2021 (5 cases, 4 after the 2nd injection). In June 2021, the signal was substantiated with 12 cases (9 related to BNT162b2, and 3 to mRNA-1273). As of September 2021, almost 73 million BNT162b2 and 10 million mRNA-1273 doses had been injected. The Rr per 100,000 injections was 0.5 (0.5-0.6) for BNT162b2 and 1.1 (95% CI 0.9-1.3) for mRNA-1273. The difference among vaccines was more pronounced after the second injection, particularly in men aged 18-24 years (4.3 [3.4-5.5] for BNT162b2 vs. 13.9 [9.2-20.1] for mRNA-1273) and aged 25-29 years (1.9 [1.2-2.9] vs. 7.0 [3.4-12.9]). CONCLUSION: The study highlighted the role of the spontaneous reporting system in the detection, assessment, and quantification of myocarditis related to m-RNA vaccines. It suggested from September 2021 that mRNA-1273 was reasonably related to a higher risk of myocarditis than BNT162b2 in people under 30, particularly after the second injection.

Pharmacovigilance follow-up of patients in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.

INTRODUCTION: In the context of COVID-19 pandemic, a national pharmacovigilance survey was set up in March 2020. The purpose of this survey was to ensure continuous monitoring of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in patients with COVID-19, not only related to the drugs used in this indication but also related to all drugs administered to these patients or suspected of having promoted the infection. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This descriptive study was based on data extracted from the French Pharmacovigilance Database from 1 January 2020 to 30 September 2021. Misuse was also analysed through the MESANGE project. The ADRs were classified according to three groups: "drugs used to treat COVID-19", "other drugs administered to COVID-19 positive patients" and "drugs suspected of having promoted COVID-19". The data were also presented according to 2 periods (period one was from January to June 2020 and period two from July 2020 onwards). RESULTS: Among 2189 included cases, 67.1% were serious. Cases were mainly related to "other drugs administrated to COVID-19 positive patients" (58.5%) followed by "drugs used to treat COVID-19" (33.7%) and "drugs suspected of having promoted COVID-19" (7.8%). Drugs used to treat COVID-19 and their main safety profile were different depending on the period: mostly hydroxychloroquine (51%) with heart injury and lopinavir/ritonavir (42%) with liver injury for the first period, and dexamethasone (46%) with hyperglycemia and tocilizumab (28%) with liver injury for the second period. The drugs suspected of worsening COVID-19 differed in both periods especially for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs mainly reported in period 1 (41.5% versus 8.2% in period 2). Other immunosuppressive drugs were in the majority in the second period (85.7%), with mainly methotrexate (15.3%), anti-CD20 (15.3%) and anti-TNF alpha (10.5%). No confirmed safety signal was identified among other drugs administered to patients with COVID-19. The profile of ADRs and suspected drugs was similar between the 2 periods. The study of misuse in outpatient settings identified in both periods mainly hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, ivermectin and zinc±vitamin C. DISCUSSION: This survey, based on real-time pharmacological and medical assessment of ADRs and weekly meetings in a specific national committee, made it possible to identify relevant safety signals which contribute to patient care with no delay. The main safety signal highlighted was serious cardiac damage under hydroxychloroquine, alone or combined with azithromycin and also with lopinavir/ritonavir. This signal has contributed to the evolution of the recommendations for these 2 drugs. The methodology of this survey has been taken over and is still going on for the pharmacovigilance monitoring of vaccines against COVID-19, for monoclonal antibodies used against COVID-19 and also for Paxlovid® (nirmatrelvir/ritonavir) which benefit from dedicated surveys.

Drug-Associated Parosmia: New Perspectives from the WHO Safety Database.

Parosmia is a qualitative distortion of smell perception. Resulting from central causes, sinonasal diseases, and infections, parosmia has also been associated with medications. Therefore, we aimed to investigate potential signals for drugs associated with parosmia. VigiBase® (the WHO pharmacovigilance database) was queried for all reports of "Parosmia" (MedDRA Preferred Term), registered up to 23 January 2022. Disproportionality analysis relied on the reporting odds ratio and the information component. A signal is detected when the lower end of the 95% confidence interval of the information component is positive. We found 14,032 reports of parosmia, with a median patient age of 53 years. Most reported drugs were antiinfectives, among which COVID-19 vaccines accounted for 27.1% of reports. Antibiotics and corticosteroids were involved in 6.8% and 4.6% of reports. Significant disproportionate reporting was detected for corticosteroids, antibiotics, drugs used in nicotine dependence, COVID-19 and HPV vaccines, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRI), and incretin mimetics. We suggest potential safety signals involving nicotine replacement therapies and vaccines. We also highlight the potential role of less suspected classes, such as SNRIs and incretin mimetics. An iatrogenic etiology should be evoked when parosmia occurs, especially in the elderly.

COVID-19 Vaccine-Associated Transient Global Amnesia: A Disproportionality Analysis of the WHO Safety Database.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) spread rapidly, resulting in a global pandemic for which vaccines were quickly developed. As their safety continues to be monitored, cases of transient global amnesia (TGA) following mRNA vaccination with elasomeran have been reported. TGA is characterized by sudden onset of anterograde amnesia with preservation of other cognitive functions and resolution within 24 h. We aimed to investigate the potential link of TGA with COVID-19 vaccines. We queried the World Health Organization VigiBase® for all reports of "Transient global amnesia", up to 6 December 2021. Disproportionality analysis relied on the Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR) with its 95% Confidence Interval (CI) and the Information Component (IC). A positive lower end of the 95% CI of the IC (IC025) is used to statistically detect a signal. Of all TGA cases, 289 were associated with a COVID-19 vaccine, representing the most frequent association. Tozinameran was mostly represented (147, 50.8%), followed by AZD1222 (69, 23,8%), elasomeran (60, 20.8%), and JNJ-78436735 (12, 4.2%). With an IC025 > 0, COVID-19 vaccines showed a significant ROR (5.1; 95%CI 4.4-6.0). Tozinameran reached the strongest ROR (4.6; 95%CI 3.9-5.0), followed by elasomeran (4.4; 95%CI 3.4-6.0), AZD1222 (3.8; 95%CI 3.0-5.0), and JNJ-78436735 (3.7; 95%CI 2.1-6.0). Our analysis of COVID-19 vaccines-related TGA reports shows significant disproportionality. Cerebrovascular, inflammatory, or migrainous mechanisms may underlie this association. Yet, numerous confounding factors cannot be tackled with this approach, and causality cannot be ascertained. The identification of this trigger of TGA may help the clinician in his etiological research.

Features of Inflammatory Heart Reactions Following mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination at a Global Level.

Myocarditis and pericarditis may constitute adverse reactions of mRNA coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines. This study aimed to document these reactions and to assess the association with patient sex and age. This is as an observational retrospective study using a case-non-case design (also called disproportionality study) on inflammatory heart reactions reported with mRNA COVID-19 vaccines within the World Health Organization (WHO) global safety database (VigiBase), up to June 30, 2021. Results are expressed using reporting odds ratios (RORs) and their 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Of 716,576 reports related to mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, 2,277 were cases of inflammatory heart reactions, including 1241 (55%) myocarditis and 851 (37%) pericarditis. The main age group was 18-29 years (704, 31%), and mostly male patients (1,555, 68%). Pericarditis onset was delayed compared with myocarditis with a median time to onset of 8 (3-21) vs. 3 (2-6) days, respectively (P = 0.001). Regarding myocarditis, an important disproportionate reporting was observed in adolescents (ROR, 22.3, 95% CI 19.2-25.9) and in 18-29 years old (ROR, 6.6, 95% CI 5.9-7.5) compared with older patients, as well as in male patients (ROR, 9.4, 95% CI 8.3-10.6). Reporting rate of myocarditis was increased in young adults and adolescents. Inflammatory heart reactions may rarely occur shortly following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination. Although an important disproportionate reporting of myocarditis was observed among adolescents and young adults, particularly in male patients, reporting rates support a very rare risk, that does not seem to compromise the largely positive benefit-risk balance of these vaccines. Furthermore, this study confirmed the value of disproportionality analyses for estimation of relative risks among subgroups of patients.

Myocarditis and pericarditis in adolescents after first and second doses of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines.

AIMS: While some concerns about vaccination-related pericarditis and/or myocarditis have been raised, no published data are available on pericarditis and/or myocarditis with mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in the age group of adolescents, particularly 12-15 years. The objective of this study was to determine whether the risk of reporting pericarditis and/or myocarditis with mRNA COVID-19 vaccines varied according to dose of vaccination, age, sex, and type of pericarditis and/or myocarditis in adolescents between 12 and 17 years. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed an observational study reviewing all reports of adolescents vaccinated with mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and recorded in VigiBase®, the World Health Organization global database of individual case safety reports. We included all reports registered between 1 January 2021 and 14 September 2021. Reporting odds ratios (RORs) with their 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated to estimate the risk of reporting pericarditis and/or myocarditis. Among 4942 reports with mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in adolescents, we identified 242 pericarditis and/or myocarditis. Compared with the first dose of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, the second dose was associated with an increased risk of reporting pericarditis and/or myocarditis (ROR 4.95; 95% CI 3.14, 7.89). The risk of reporting pericarditis and/or myocarditis was 10 times higher in boys than in girls and no difference between the two types of vaccines could be demonstrated. CONCLUSION: This investigation including only adolescent data suggests for the first time that the second dose of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines increases the risk of reporting myocarditis/pericarditis compared with the first dose particularly in boys without significant difference between tozinameran and elasomeran.

French Pharmacovigilance Public System and COVID-19 Pandemic.

The current COVID-19 pandemic is an exceptional health situation including for drug use. As there was no known effective drug for COVID-19 at the beginning of the pandemic, different candidates were proposed. In this short article, we present the French public pharmacovigilance activities during this health crisis. Although COVID-19 is a confounding factor per se, owing to its potential for multi-organ damage including the heart and kidney, the quality of the transmitted data in adverse drug reaction reports, the timeliness of feedback from clinicians, and the real-time pharmacological and medical analysis by the French network of the regional pharmacovigilance centers made it possible to swiftly identify relevant safety signals. The French National Agency of Medicine was thus able to validate the data and convey their findings very early. This decentralized organization based on medical and pharmacological evaluation of case reports has proven to be efficient and responsive in this unique and challenging healthcare emergency.

Spontaneous reported cardiotoxicity induced by lopinavir/ritonavir in COVID-19. An alleged past-resolved problem.

The antiretroviral drug lopinavir/ritonavir has been recently repurposed for the treatment of COVID-19. Its empirical use has been associated with multiple cardiac adverse reactions pertaining to its ancillary multi-channel blocking properties, vaguely characterized until now. We aimed to characterize qualitatively the cardiotoxicity associated with lopinavir/ritonavir in the setting of COVID-19. Spontaneous notifications of cardiac adverse drug reactions reported to the national Pharmacovigilance Network were collected for 8 weeks since March 1st 2020. The Nice Regional Center of Pharmacovigilance, whose scope of expertise is drug-induced long QT syndrome, analyzed the cases, including the reassessment of all available ECGs. QTc ≥ 500 ms and delta QTc > 60 ms from baseline were deemed serious. Twenty-two cases presented with 28 cardiac adverse reactions associated with the empirical use of lopinavir/ritonavir in a hospital setting. Most adverse reactions reflected lopinavir/ritonavir potency to block voltage-gated potassium channels with 5 ventricular arrhythmias and 17 QTc prolongations. An average QTc augmentation of 97 ± 69 ms was reported. Twelve QTc prolongations were deemed serious. Other cases were likely related to lopinavir/ritonavir potency to block sodium channels: 1 case of bundle branch block and 5 recurrent bradycardias. The incidence of cardiac adverse reactions of lopinavir/ritonavir was estimated between 0.3% and 0.4%. These cardiac adverse drug reactions offer a new insight in its ancillary multi-channel blocking functions. Lopinavir/ritonavir cardiotoxicity may be of concern for its empirical use during the COVID-19 pandemic. Caution should be exerted relative to this risk where lopinavir/ritonavir summary of product characteristics should be implemented accordingly.

Remdesivir and Acute Renal Failure: A Potential Safety Signal From Disproportionality Analysis of the WHO Safety Database.

Remdesivir is approved for emergency use by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and authorized conditionally by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Its benefit-risk ratio is still being explored because data in the field are rather scant. A decrease of the creatinine clearance associated with remdesivir has been inconstantly reported in clinical trials with unclear relevance. Despite these uncertainties, we searched for a potential signal of acute renal failure (ARF) in pharmacovigilance postmarketing data. An analysis of the international pharmacovigilance postmarketing databases (VigiBase) of the World Health Organization (WHO) was performed, using two disproportionality methods. Reporting odds ratio (ROR) compared the number of ARF cases reported with remdesivir, with those reported with other drugs prescribed in comparable situations of COVID-19 (hydroxychloroquine, tocilizumab, and lopinavir/ritonavir). The combination of the terms "acute renal failure" and "remdesivir" yielded a statistically significant disproportionality signal with 138 observed cases instead of the 9 expected. ROR of ARF with remdesivir was 20-fold (20.3; confidence interval 0.95 [15.7-26.3], P < 0.0001]) that of comparative drugs. Based on ARF cases reported in VigiBase, and despite the caveats inherent to COVID-19 circumstances, we detected a statistically significant pharmacovigilance signal of nephrotoxicity associated with remdesivir, deserving a thorough qualitative assessment of all available data. Meanwhile, as recommended in its Summary of Product Characteristics, assessment of patients with COVID-19 renal function should prevail before and during treatment with remdesivir in COVID-19.

Insights on the Evidence of Cardiotoxicity of Hydroxychloroquine Prior and During COVID-19 Epidemic.

The recent empirical use of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) revived the interest in its cardiac toxicity, increasingly sidelined over time. We aimed to assess and compare the profile of cardiac adverse drug reactions (CADRs) associated with HCQ before and during COVID-19. We performed a retrospective comparative observational study using the French Pharmacovigilance network database between 1985 and May 2020 to assess all postmarketing CADRs associated with HCQ notified before COVID-19 in its approved indications for lupus and rheumatoid arthritis (preCOV), and those concerning its empirical use in COVID-19 (COV). Eighty-five CADR in preCOV were compared with 141 CADRs in COV. The most common CADR of preCOV were cardiomyopathies (42.4%) and conduction disorders (28.2%), both statistically more frequent than in COV (P < 0.001). COV notifications significantly highlighted repolarization and ventricular rhythm disorders (78.0%, P < 0.001) as well as sinus bradycardias (14.9%, P = 0.01) as compared with preCOV. Estimated incidence of CADR was significantly higher among patients exposed to off-label use of HCQ in COVID-19 (2.9%) than before COVID-19 in its approved indications (0.01%, P < 0.001). The use of HCQ in COVID-19 sheds a new light on the spectrum of its cardiac toxicity. This fosters the value of a closer monitoring of all patients treated with HCQ, regardless of its indication, and the importance of an update of its summary of product characteristics.

“Off-label” use of hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, lopinavir-ritonavir and chloroquine in COVID-19: a survey of cardiac adverse drug reactions by the French Network of Pharmacovigilance Centers

Summary Introduction: COVID-19 is an unprecedented challenge for physicians and scientists. Several publicized drugs are being used with not much evidence of their efficacy such as hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin or lopinavir-ritonavir. Yet, the cardiac safety of these drugs in COVID-19 deserves scrutiny as they are known to foster cardiac adverse ADRs, notably QTc interval prolongation on the electrocardiogram and its arrhythmogenic consequences. Methods: Since March 27th, 2020, the French Pharmacovigilance Network directed all cardiac adverse drug reactions associated with “off-label” use of hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin and lopinavir-ritonavir in COVID-19 to the Nice Regional Center of Pharmacovigilance. Each Regional Center of Pharmacovigilance first assessed causality of drugs. We performed a specific analysis of these cardiac adverse drug reactions amidst an array of risk factors, reassessed the electrocardiograms and estimated their incidence in coronavirus-disease-2019. Results: In one month, 120 reports of cardiac adverse drug reactions have been notified, 102 of which associated with hydroxychloroquine alone (85%), or associated with azithromycin (60%). Their estimated incidence is 0.77% to 1.54% of all patients, notwithstanding strong underreporting. Lopinavir-ritonavir came third with 17 reports (14%) and chloroquine fourth with 3 reports (2.5%). There were 8 sudden, unexplained or aborted deaths (7%), 8 ventricular arrhythmias (7 %), 90 reports of prolonged QTc (75%) most of them “serious” (64%), 48 of which proved ≥ 500 ms, 20 reports of severe conduction disorders (17%) and 5 reports of other cardiac causes (4%). Six reports derived from automedication. Discussion and conclusion: “Off-label” use of treatments in COVID-19 increases the risk of cardiac ADRs, some of them avoidable. Even if these drugs are perceived as familiar, they are used in patients with added risk factors caused by infection. Precautions should be taken to mitigate the risk, even if they will be proven efficacious.